January 10, 2025 ⏱️ 8 min
By Mirela L. (QA – Process Design Group)
You may have encountered a common bias in the IT market that developers and testers are both equally capable of testing an application and achieving comparable results. But are they really?
We’ll break down this myth and explain the differences between the two, as well as the mindsets they bring to their work.
Developers Develop and Testers Test?
The truth is, developers do test – whether it’s unit tests, integration tests, or just making sure their code doesn’t break everything else. No one wants to be the one who pulls the “works on my machine” card! Today, with continuous integration and rapid releases, testing is just as much a part of a developer’s job as coding itself.
Error Prevention Mindset: How to protect your applications from development pitfalls
Here’s a simple way for developers to organize their workflow to avoid mistakes and keep things running smoothly, without getting stuck in long debates about the app’s design:
1. Identifying threats early in the Design Phase
Like any superhero, it’s crucial to anticipate danger ahead of time. While working on the design and writing code, attention is focused on those “risky” spots where errors could pop up like smoke from a magic lamp. If the design is likely to become a trap later on, it’s adjusted during the development phase. Prevention is always faster than fixing!
2. Unit Testing
First up, the famous unit tests. Think of them as the little soldiers of the code world. Developers test small pieces of code, ensuring each part works on its own before assembling the full army of features. It’s like making sure the engine is running smoothly before taking the car for a spin – no one wants to discover a problem halfway down the road!
3. Testing during Development
Once a section of code is ready, the first round of testing begins. Testing happens along the way, ensuring smooth functionality and integration into the app. If something is off, adjustments are made early – like an architect ensuring the structure holds up at every stage.
4. Integration Testing
After individual parts are working correctly, integration testing verifies how these pieces interact with one another. This step ensures that everything fits together seamlessly, much like ensuring all the gears in a machine turn smoothly together. It’s also an opportunity to check that no “dynamite” has been left in areas where existing code was modified.
5. Functional Testing
Finally, functional testing serves as a blueprint check for the code. It validates that the application behaves as expected from an end-user perspective, covering all changes made during development.
6. Testing at the End of Development
When the code is finished and everything is in place, final tests act as a comprehensive exam, covering the entirety of the changes. If the application passes, the work is considered successful – if not, there’s still room to apply a few tricks and make adjustments as needed. In the end, the development process isn’t a race against the clock – it’s a strategic game.
If developers focus on addressing errors early on and follow these testing stages, not only do they create more stable applications, but they’re also happier in the process. After all, who wants to chase bugs all day when you can prevent them from the start?
What is a QA Doing Differently
Perspective matters: Why QA testers think like friendly saboteurs
QA testers approach software differently from developers, who are closely tied to the code they write. While developers aim to build features, QA testers intentionally “break” the system by exploring edge cases, usability, and unexpected inputs.
They bring fresh eyes and aren’t afraid to press every button (twice) to see what breaks. Their goal is to identify issues that could disrupt the end-user experience, catching bugs that developers might overlook.
However, testing alone is not enough. It’s part of the larger quality assurance (QA) process, which involves careful planning, defining standards and continuously improving the product, making sure every click, swipe, and interaction delivers a seamless experience. After all, someone has to make sure the product doesn’t crash when you press that button!
By adopting a user-centered approach, QA testers become the behind-the-scenes champions of product reliability, functionality, and user satisfaction. Think of them as the product’s first line of defense, ensuring everything works as expected before it reaches the end user. For example, if they’re testing a food delivery app, QA might check that the order process is smooth, from choosing a meal to receiving the confirmation notification – because nothing says “customer satisfaction” like an order that actually arrives on time! They’ll also test the app under various conditions, like when a user’s phone is running low on storage, or when Wi-Fi is spotty, because users don’t care about technical jargon – they just want their pizza delivered, no excuses.
By focusing on real user scenarios, QA testers make sure the user experience runs as smoothly as a bug-free release, making them an essential part of any quality-driven development process. After all, if a user can navigate your app as easily as they navigate the difference between a “cloud” and an actual cloud, you’ve got a winner on your hands.
Foster collaboration
QA testers take a friendly, collaborative approach during the development phase, working closely with developers to identify and fix issues early on. Then, when the product enters the acceptance phase, they magically transform into the client, testing the product as if they’re the ones paying for it. It’s the perfect balance – collaboration during development and a sharp user focus during acceptance. This mix makes sure the product is both flawless as possible and user-approved!
QA Testing: Early Involvement and the Bigger Picture
QA testers jump in as early as possible, often during the planning and development stages, to identify potential issues before they snowball into bigger problems. For example, during sprint planning, QA can help clarify feature requirements, ensuring developers understand the end user’s needs. Early involvement also allows testers to spot performance issues, such as slow load times or memory leaks, before the code reaches production and impacts the user experience. By testing prototypes or mockups, QA can validate assumptions and reduce costly revisions later.
Furthermore, finding and addressing security issues (both OWASP or domain specific) ensures that the product cannot be attacked or hijacked and saves a lot of hustle and budget to bring the product up and running again. Load testing early on also ensures that the product cannot be broken if it sees a high load and continues to function, thus avoiding costly infrastructure changes or even losing orders or processes due to insufficient resources allocated during peak usage conditions.
This proactive approach, such as identifying inconsistencies in the user interface or layout early, ensures smoother development, fewer production bugs, and a more efficient release process.
In addition to their technical responsibilities, testers often take on the role of the team’s scribe, recording meeting notes to ensure that everyone is aligned on expectations for development and delivery. They help prioritize tasks and are skilled in balancing different viewpoints – whether facilitating communication between team members or stepping into the shoes of the client to provide valuable feedback.
As applications grow in size and complexity, the need for documentation also increases – guess who takes charge of this? The QA tester. Whether it’s maintaining up-to-date user manuals or drafting concise release notes, they ensure that the product’s documentation reflects the latest changes and remains accessible for users and stakeholders alike.
Choose your tools wisely
As developers work on features or user stories, they focus on the specified acceptance criteria or technical requirements. But is that really enough? A broader approach is necessary. It’s important to take a step back and consider fundamental questions first: What needs to be tested? How should it be tested? And when should it be tested?
To address these questions, QAs use test plans. Test plans provide answers to all of them. Test cases, for instance, specify how to check acceptance criteria (the same focus developers have). But by combining multiple test cases, testers create test scenarios that cover different user paths. This is where the tester’s value comes in – ensuring these scenarios are in accordance with what a normal user would do and cover the business value everyone is looking for.
For repetitive tasks, an automated test suite is essential. It quickly validates functionality with each update, saving time and effort. However, exploratory testing is equally important. This is where testers go off-script, using their intuition to uncover issues that might not be covered by the formal criteria – like edge cases or unexpected user behaviors. After all, there’s always that ‘one’ user who will find the bug you missed, and testers make sure that doesn’t ruin their experience.
By using a mix of these tools, QA testers ensure that they cover all the bases – automated tests for speed, manual tests for creativity, and exploratory tests for the surprises that could derail a smooth user experience.
Do You Really Need a QA Tester?
Well, technically, you can have your developers handle testing, but a dedicated QA tester brings unique value to the team. Their value isn’t about what you pay to have them – it’s about how much they save you by catching issues early, avoiding costly fixes, and ensuring your users never feel like they’re beta testing your product.
Testers and developers each bring their own superpowers to the table. Developers are busy building the product while testers are trained to critically evaluate it, think like end-users and uncover hidden issues. Each role should focus on what they do best: developers creating and testers ensuring everything works as intended. Together, they make a balanced and efficient team.